Prepare Smarter for the 2V0-13.25 Exam
Build your exam confidence with flexible preparation resources designed around the latest 2V0-13.25 exam objectives. Practice at your own pace using PDF questions, online exam simulations, or desktop practice software.
An architect had been given a constraint to use an existing storage array to support the virtual infrastructure design project.
The architect documents the following:
Assumption 01: The existing storage array has sufficient capacity and performance to support the intended workloads.
Risk 01: There is a risk that the performance and capacity of the existing storage array may not be sufficient for the solution.
How would the architect mitigate the risk?
Correct Answer: A
The constraint forces the use of the existing array. However, there’s a risk that performance/capacity may be insufficient.
VMware’s best practice for risk mitigation in RACR is to plan for contingency .
A is correct because securing budget allocation for additional hardware addresses the risk if the array cannot meet requirements.
B (RAID mirroring) improves redundancy, not performance or capacity.
C contradicts the constraint (cannot ignore existing array).
D (extra Fibre Channel switches) doesn’t address storage array performance/capacity.
Thus, the best mitigation is budget planning for new hardware if the array fails to meet requirements.
[Reference: VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0 – Risk and Constraint Handling in Conceptual Design., , ]
Requirement: The solution must include high security hardening levels to meet military compliance standards.
Which two physical design decisions will meet this security requirement in the workload domain? (Choose two.)
Correct Answer: D, E
D : Setting UserVars.SuppressShellWarning = 0 ensures warnings are shown when shell access is used , improving auditability and compliance.
E : Using certificates signed by a trusted military Root CA aligns with security compliance standards for certificate trust and chain of custody.
Options A and C are operational best practices, but not military hardening . B is about operations automation, not compliance-level hardening.
[Reference: VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0 Security Hardening Guide., , ]
An organization is evacuating their current datacenter and moving all workloads to a new datacenter. The organization has a total of 800 workloads to move,
and the migration must be completed with no downtime within a planned change window
that is scheduled to occur in four weeks.
What migration method will meet the requirements?
Correct Answer: D
The requirements specify:
Large-scale migration (800 workloads).
No downtime.
Strict change window (4 weeks).
HCX Replication Assisted vMotion (RAV) is the only method that combines large-scale migration efficiency with zero downtime :
Workloads are replicated in advance.
During the cutover, a vMotion-like switchover completes with no outage.
Other methods:
Cross vCenter vMotion works for live moves but is not efficient for hundreds of VMs within a short timeline.
HCX OS Assisted Migration is for physical-to-virtual or non-vSphere workloads (not applicable).
HCX Bulk Migration is efficient but introduces downtime during cutover.
Thus, HCX RAV best meets the no-downtime, large-scale requirement.
[Reference: VMware HCX Migration Guide – Replication Assisted vMotion Use Cases., , ]
During a design workshop, the customer provided the following requirement:
• Business units should not be able to interfere with the operations of a different business unit.
As a result of this requirement, the architect makes the decision to enable multi-tenancy within VCF Automation.
A combination of which two design implications would also need to be documented? (Choose two.)
Correct Answer: B, C
Per the VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.1 and 9.0.4 Architecture and Automation Design Guides , VCF Automation enables multi-tenancy by assigning dedicated orchestration instances per organization for secure separation of workflows.
The documentation specifies:
“The embedded VCF Operations orchestrator is installed by default as part of the Provider Consumption Organization. Each tenant organization that requires workflow autonomy must deploy its own external VCF Operations orchestrator instance.”
Thus, in a multi-tenant model:
The Provider Tenant uses the embedded VCF Operations Orchestrator instance to manage global workflows.
Each Tenant Organization must use its own external orchestrator instance for isolation, control, and workflow management.
This design ensures logical separation , prevents cross-tenant interference , and aligns with VCF’s security and autonomy best practices for service provider and enterprise models.
References (VMware Cloud Foundation documents):
VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.1 Design Guide — “VCF Automation Orchestrator Deployment Options (Embedded vs. External).”
VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.4 Design Guide — “VCF Operations Orchestrator Integration for Multi-Tenant Organizations.”
An architect is designing a VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) fleet. The following information has been provided by the customer:
Due to budget constraints, the solution must utilize the existing server hardware.
The existing server hardware consists of server models from the same vendor but different generations.
There are ten servers available for use in this solution.
Management and Business workloads should be hosted in different clusters.
What design decision should the architect make for the lifecycle management of the solution based on this information?
Correct Answer: B
In VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0, vSphere Lifecycle Manager (vLCM) with composite images is the recommended method for managing host lifecycle.
However, when using hardware of different generations , it ' s not advisable to use a single composite image across clusters with hardware inconsistencies
due to potential compatibility mismatches with firmware and drivers.
By using separate vLCM composite images for each cluster (i.e., management and workload), the architect ensures that each cluster '
s image is optimized for its specific hardware generation , reducing the risk of driver/firmware issues
during updates or drift remediation.
This design aligns with the principle of cluster-level lifecycle independence , especially important when working with a mix of hardware generations.
[Reference:VMware Cloud Foundation Lifecycle Management Design Guide – vSphere Lifecycle Manager Best PracticesVMware vSphere 8 Lifecycle Manager Guide – Composite Image Strategy for Heterogeneous Hosts, ===========]